El Salvador's Offer to Take in US Deportees and Violent Criminals Is Unlike Any Other Migrant Deal

El Salvador has offered to take in people deported from the U.S. for entering the country illegally as well as the country's violent criminals -- even if they're American citizens

It's also clear that he wants our taxes to go down and our government to get smaller.

It has been nearly four years since pipe bombs were discovered near the Republican and Democratic National Committee headquarters on January 6, 2021. Planted on the eve of the Capitol riots, these bombs were strategically positioned to maximize disruption and fear. Their discovery mere hours before the planned certification of electoral votes not only diverted law enforcement resources but also heightened the chaos surrounding an already tumultuous day. Yet, in the years since, the investigation into this critical incident has produced little more than whispers and excuses. No suspects, no arrests, no satisfying answers.

This investigative paralysis cannot be dismissed as mere bureaucratic inefficiency or technological shortcomings. Instead, it increasingly appears that the FBI concluded early on that the perpetrator was one of their own: a federal asset or informant. Evidence supporting this includes the FBI's reluctance to act decisively on identified devices and geofence data aligning with the suspect's movements, as well as their refusal to release complete investigative records despite repeated Congressional inquiries.
From the outset, the FBI demonstrated an inexplicable reluctance to act decisively. Security camera footage showed the suspect handling a phone while planting the bombs. A geofence warrant yielded data on hundreds of devices in the area, yet the FBI alleged that some of the cellular data was "corrupted," a claim vehemently denied by the carriers themselves. These contradictions--between FBI statements and available facts--raise serious questions about the investigation's integrity.

By March 2021, the FBI had identified devices and AdTech identifiers that aligned with the suspect's movements, yet the investigation stagnated. This apparent deprioritization of leads raises questions about whether external pressures, such as political considerations or an effort to protect institutional credibility, influenced the decision to curtail further action. Surveillance of persons of interest was ordered, but the outcomes remain unknown. Even basic forensic avenues failed--DNA and fingerprint analysis of the bombs yielded nothing. While such setbacks could happen in any investigation, the FBI's lack of transparency fuels suspicion.

The events of January 6 have been framed as an insurrection, an existential threat to democracy perpetrated by Trump supporters. This narrative has justified unprecedented lawfare against conservatives, including hundreds of arrests and convictions. Acknowledging that the pipe bomber might have been a federal asset would shatter this carefully cultivated narrative. It would lend credence to those who argue that January 6 was not just a failure of security but a political operation aimed at demonizing Trump supporters.

If the FBI indeed curtailed its investigation to protect a federal asset, the implications are staggering. Such a revelation would cast doubt on the institution's ability to act as a neutral arbiter of justice. It would suggest that the agency's primary allegiance lies not with the American people but with preserving its own power and shielding its political allies.

This episode would also vindicate critics of the so-called "deep state"--those who argue that federal institutions have become tools of the elite, weaponized to crush dissent and enforce ideological conformity. It would expose the January 6 narrative for what it truly is: a political cudgel wielded to marginalize Trump supporters and bolster the Democratic Party's agenda.